Wall Street Journal: We’re Number 32!

ED-AS676_1taxin_G_20140914191805

This recent Review and Outlook from the Wall Street Journal addresses the harm US businesses suffer from the Tax code and how the Obama Administration will be seeking to make things worse:

Any day now the White House and Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) will attempt to raise taxes on business, while making the U.S. tax code even more complex. The Obama and Schumer plans to punish businesses for moving their legal domicile overseas will arrive even as a new international ranking shows that the U.S. tax burden on business is close to the worst in the industrialized world. Way to go, Washington.

On Monday the Tax Foundation, which manages the widely followed State Business Tax Climate Index, will launch a new global benchmark, the International Tax Competitiveness Index. According to the foundation, the new index measures “the extent to which a country’s tax system adheres to two important principles of tax policy: competitiveness and neutrality.”

A competitive tax code is one that limits the taxation of businesses and investment. Since capital is mobile and businesses can choose where to invest, tax rates that are too high “drive investment elsewhere, leading to slower economic growth,” as the Tax Foundation puts it.

By neutrality the foundation means “a tax code that seeks to raise the most revenue with the fewest economic distortions. This means that it doesn’t favor consumption over saving, as happens with capital gains and dividends taxes, estate taxes, and high progressive income taxes. This also means no targeted tax breaks for businesses for specific business activities.” Crony capitalism that rewards the likes of green energy with lower tax bills while imposing higher bills on other firms is political arbitrage that misallocates capital and reduces economic growth.

The index takes into account more than 40 tax policy variables. And the inaugural ranking puts the U.S. at 32nd out of 34 industrialized countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

With the developed world’s highest corporate tax rate at over 39% including state levies, plus a rare demand that money earned overseas should be taxed as if it were earned domestically, the U.S. is almost in a class by itself. It ranks just behind Spain and Italy, of all economic humiliations. America did beat Portugal and France, which is currently run by an avowed socialist.

The Tax Foundation benchmark compares developed economies with large and expensive governments, but the U.S. would do even worse if it were measured against the world’s roughly 190 countries. The accounting firm KPMG maintains a corporate tax table that includes more than 130 countries and only one has a higher overall corporate tax rate than the U.S. The United Arab Emirates’ 55% rate is an exception, however, because it usually applies only to foreign oil companies.

The new ranking is especially timely coming amid the campaign led by Messrs. Obama and Schumer to punish companies that move their legal domicile overseas to be able to reinvest future profits in the U.S. without paying the punitive American tax rate. If they succeed, the U.S. could fall to dead last on next year’s ranking. Now there’s a second-term legacy project for the President.

The new index also suggests taxation is a greater burden on business in the U.S. than in countries that American liberals have long praised as models of enlightened big government. Finland, Germany, Norway and Sweden, with their large social safety nets, all finish in the top 20 on the new ranking. The United Kingdom manages to fund socialized medicine while finishing 11 spots ahead of the U.S.

The new champion of tax competitiveness is Estonia, where—liberals may be astonished to learn—people enjoy the rule of law and even paved roads, despite reasonable tax rates. (See the list nearby.)

Liberals argue that U.S. tax rates don’t need to come down because they are already well below the level when Ronald Reagan came into office. But unlike the U.S., the world hasn’t stood still. Reagan’s tax-cutting example ignited a worldwide revolution that has seen waves of corporate tax-rate reductions. The U.S. last reduced the top marginal corporate income tax rate in 1986. But the Tax Foundation reports that other countries have reduced “the OECD average corporate tax rate from 47.5 percent in the early 1980s to around 25 percent today.”

This is also a message to self-styled conservative “reformers” who lecture that today’s economic challenges aren’t the same as they were under Reagan but propose to do nothing about the destructive U.S. corporate tax code. They’re missing what could be the single biggest tax boost to economic growth and worker incomes. Abundant economic research, by Kevin Hassett and Aparna Mathur among others, has shown that higher corporate taxes lead to lower wages.

Rather than erecting an iron tax curtain that keeps U.S. companies from escaping, the White House and Congress should enact reform that invites more businesses to stay or move to the U.S.

Posted in economics, politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The “OMG! I’m old” post

This video was released about 5 days ago. While I try to avoid posting videos that have already gone viral, every now and then one comes along that hits home and I just have to share.

As a kid, I loved video games. I had Pong, Atari, Nintendo, the Commodore 64, I had them all growing up.  Those days are far behind me, something I am all too aware of, but sometimes it just smacks you in the face.

Watch as a group of today’s teens are introduced to an old Nintendo NES. This is the game that was considered an improvement over the games I mention and credited with revitalizing the gaming industry.

The video is fun to watch and I don’t even have any snarky comments about the teens in the video.

Well, I do. But I want to keep this post congenial and light hearted.

I mean, I may be old.

But I haven’t reached grumpy old man status.

Not yet.

Posted in humor | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

Two videos that put President Obama’s primetime address in proper perspective

For the most part, the President’s primetime address to the nation Wednesday night has not been well received by the American people. Heck, the administration itself  spent the next day downplaying the address. Given the President’s track record on foreign policy are we surprised:

Wednesday night was a pivotal moment for the President. It’s not often when a president gives perhaps the most important speech of their presidency.

Oh wait:

If this wasn’t so pathetic I’d be laughing.

And I try to laugh at everything.

 

 

Posted in politics | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment